← All Netgraph solutions
CTEMExposure & Validation

The exposure lifecycle as a working loop, not a slide.

Netgraph runs the full Gartner five-stage exposure lifecycle end to end — scope your crown jewels, discover what you actually have, rank exposures by real attack-path reachability on the knowledge graph, prove exploitability with breach & attack simulation, and mobilize fixes with deploy receipts that close the loop. Every stage reads and writes the same graph the rest of the platform lives on.

Five-stage lifecycleGraph-ranked prioritizationBAS-validated exposuresK-hop blast radiusDigital-twin kill chainsDeploy receipts close the loop

What is CTEM (Continuous Threat Exposure Management)?

CTEM is the discipline of continuously scoping, discovering, prioritizing, validating, and mobilizing against the exposures an attacker could actually use — rather than patching by CVSS score alone. Netgraph implements the full five-stage lifecycle on the security knowledge graph: exposures are ranked by real reachability and blast radius (can an attacker actually get from the internet to this asset, and what falls if they do), validated with BAS, and mobilized through the same case and playbook machinery the SOC already runs.

What ships in the module

Five stages, one graph, no gaps between them.

01

Scoping

Crown-jewel and business-context scoping per tenant — declare what matters, and every downstream stage ranks against it instead of treating all assets as equal.

02

Discovery

Assets, identities, vulnerabilities, misconfigurations and data locations — pulled from the endpoint agent's UEM inventory, cloud posture scans, the vulnerability DB and DSPM. No separate discovery tooling to deploy.

03

Prioritization

Exposures ranked by real attack-path reachability on the knowledge graph — runtime + code + identity + data — not CVSS in isolation. A path to a crown jewel outweighs a raw severity score.

04

Validation

Breach & attack simulation with real telemetry read-back proves whether an exposure is exploitable and whether you would detect the attempt — two answers from one run.

05

Mobilization

Findings route to owners via cases, playbooks and ticketing integrations. Deploy receipts confirm the fix actually landed — the loop closes on evidence, not on a ticket status.

06

Blast-radius analysis

K-hop traversal from any node — host, identity, workload, data store — scopes what an adversary could reach from that foothold, straight off the graph.

07

Digital-twin simulation

Kill-chain simulation runs live over the AGE property graph to project attack paths against your real topology — before an adversary walks them.

08

Dark Web Monitoring

A licensed add-on under CTEM: external exposure — leaked credentials, brand and executive mentions — feeds the same lifecycle. Fully inert unless licensed.

09

Exposure trends

Exposure posture over time surfaces on the CISO dashboard and risk metrics — so leadership sees the loop turning, not a point-in-time scan report.

Prioritization, done honestly

Rank by paths to crown jewels — not by CVSS alone.

Most exposure tools re-sort a CVE list. Netgraph walks the knowledge graph: which exposures sit on real paths — through runtime, code, identity and data edges — to the assets you scoped as crown jewels? Those go to the top. Then BAS validation tells you whether the path is exploitable and whether your detections would fire along it.

  • Reachability computed across runtime + code + identity + data edges — one graph, four dimensions.
  • A medium-severity CVE with live paths to a crown jewel outranks a critical CVE on an isolated host.
  • Validation runs prove exploitability and detectability with real telemetry read-back.
  • Mobilized fixes come back as deploy receipts — the exposure closes when the evidence says so.

Functionality map

Module functions at a glance

FunctionWhat it doesWhere it lives
ScopingCrown-jewel and business-context scoping per tenantCTEM ▸ Scoping
DiscoveryAssets, identities, vulns, misconfigs, data locations — from UEM, cloud posture, vuln DB, DSPMCTEM ▸ Discovery
PrioritizationExposure ranking by attack-path reachability to crown jewels on the graphCTEM ▸ Prioritization
ValidationBAS runs prove exploitability and detectability with real telemetry read-backCTEM ▸ Validation
MobilizationFindings route to owners via cases, playbooks, ticketing — deploy receipts close the loopCTEM ▸ Mobilization
Blast radiusK-hop traversal from any node scopes adversary reachAnalytics ▸ Blast Radius
Digital twinLive kill-chain simulation over the AGE property graph projects attack pathsCTEM ▸ Digital Twin
Exposure trendsPosture over time for leadership and risk reportingDashboards ▸ Risk Metrics / CISO Dashboard

Common questions

CTEM — asked and answered

How does CTEM differ from vulnerability management?+

Vulnerability management enumerates and patches CVEs. CTEM asks the attacker's question: which exposures are reachable, exploitable, and consequential in *this* environment — including misconfigurations, identity weaknesses, and exposed data, not just CVEs — and validates the answer with simulation before spending remediation effort.

Why does CTEM need a knowledge graph?+

Because exposure priority is a path question: internet → asset → identity → data. Ranking by attack paths requires runtime, code, identity, and data context in one queryable structure. On the Netgraph graph that traversal is native; with separate tools it's a spreadsheet exercise. Our research piece 'CTEM as an emerging discipline' covers how this ends the multi-vendor tool tax.

Does CTEM include dark web and external exposure?+

Yes — Dark Web Monitoring is a licensed CTEM add-on, and external attack-surface discovery feeds the same exposure lifecycle as internal findings.

See it live

Scope one crown jewel. Watch the loop find the paths to it.